The 2024 7th Grade Math STAAR continued both statewide online testing and several new item types. Using a modified version of the statewide item analysis report, I examined the readiness standards that had less than 60% mastery. Each standard has both an analysis of the items themselves to infer what made them so difficult and instructional implications for educators to ensure a more successful 2025 STAAR test.
Standard | # of items | % mastery |
7.9D | 2 | 32 |
7.9B | 2 | 37.5 |
7.4A | 2 | 39 |
7.7A | 2 | 39.5 |
7.11A | 2 | 40 |
7.6I | 2 | 44 |
7.3B | 2 | 45 |
7.6G | 2 | 46 |
7.4D | 2 | 47 |
7.9A | 1 | 52 |
7.12A | 2 | 53.5 |
7.6H | 2 | 54 |
Access the slide deck here.
7.9C - 32% overall mastery
determine the area of composite figures containing combinations of rectangles, squares, parallelograms, trapezoids, triangles, semicircles, and quarter circles
#12 - 17% correct
#36 - 47% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Practice decomposing each shape into different shapes and calculating
Remove answer choices from multiple choice items to increase rigor
Show how to calculate area by finding total and removing a section (#12)
7.9B - 37.5% overall mastery
determine the circumference and area of circles
#14 - 31% correct
#25 - 44% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Use estimates for pi (e.g., 3) to practice solving for radius given the area
Use given radii answers to substitute into the formula for area to solve
Given diameter, practice finding both area and circumference to practice differentiating between the two
Watch the full walkthrough of all 38 items on the 2024 7th Grade STAAR below.
7.4A - 39% overall mastery
represent constant rates of change in mathematical and real-world problems given pictorial, tabular, verbal, numeric, graphical, and algebraic representations, including d = rt
#16 - 49% correct
#30 - 29% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Practice slightly adjusting units when giving rates and graphing them (e.g., 0.5 m per hour and the y-axis shows meters)
Practice graphing on paper first, showing multiple points that all sit on the same line, before moving to online platform
7.7A - 39.5% overall mastery
represent linear relationships using verbal descriptions, tables, graphs, and equations that simplify to the form y = mx + b
#15 - 30% correct
#18 - 29% full credit; 40% partial credit; 31% no credit
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Spend time exploring how the slope-intercept form of a linear equation translates directly onto a graph (e.g., y-intercept)
Take four iterations of linear equations (i.e., table, equation, graph, verbal description) and turn into a matching game to stamp their interchangeability
7.11A - 40% overall mastery
model and solve one-variable, two-step equations and inequalities
#10 - 35% full credit; 35% partial credit; 30% no credit
#34 - 27% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Show students how to check their work with substitution to verify that the inequality changes when multiplying or dividing by a negative
Practice combining like terms (both constants and variables) when solving equations
7.6I - 44% overall mastery
determine experimental and theoretical probabilities related to simple and compound events using data and sample spaces
#13 - 33% correct
#31 - 55% correct
Analysis
Students were more successful with the simple probability (#31) than the compound probability (#13)
For #13, more students chose C (41%) than correct answer [divided # of events described by total number of events]
Instructional Implications
Students should have practice identifying situation as either a simple or compound event and verbally describing the process to solve
Sample spaces can be useful for identifying possible outcomes for compound events
7.3B - 45% overall mastery
apply and extend previous understandings of operations to solve problems using addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of rational numbers
#5 - 35% correct
#24 - 55% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Show students how to draw strip diagram to organize thinking and identify the correct operations needed
Extra practice with finding least common denominator of multiple fractions
7.6G - 46% overall mastery
solve problems using data represented in bar graphs, dot plots, and circle graphs, including part-to-whole and part-to-part comparisons and equivalents
#11 - 33% correct
#21 - 34% full credit; 49% partial credit; 17% no credit
Analysis
Instructional Implications
First practice reading circle graphs when the total is 100 and then add complexity by changing the total
Dot plots and bar graphs are about finding a fraction/percent of the data, not simply reading the graph
7.4D - 47% overall mastery
solve problems involving ratios, rates, and percents, including multi-step problems involving percent increase and percent decrease, and financial literacy problems
#20 - 41% correct
#37 - 37% full credit; 32% partial credit; 31% no credit
Analysis
For #20, 26% of students chose A (discount) and 29% of students chose C (210 - 25)
For the first time, students were tested with a ratio given in three parts (#37)
Instructional Implications
This standard contains many breakouts, including percent increase and decrease (tested 2023)
Students should solidify their understanding as percents as a ratio (per 100) to build their schema
Work with ratios given in 3, 4, or even 5 parts to increase stamina
7.9A - 52% overall mastery
generate equivalent forms of fractions, decimals, and percents using real-world problems, including problems that involve money
#4 - 52% correct
Analysis
Both B and h were given, students just had to select correct formula (V=⅓Bh)
29% of students chose C, incorrectly using formula for volume of a prism/cylinder (V=Bh)
Instructional Implications
Drawing a representation, even if difficult, will help students select the correct formula
7.12a - 53.5% overall mastery
compare two groups of numeric data using comparative dot plots or box plots by comparing their shapes, centers, and spreads
#17 - 48% correct
#32 - 59% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Data problems are more about vocabulary that calculation
Have students differentiate data representations that can be used to calculate mean (e.g., dot plot, list) and those that cannot (e.g., box plot, histogram)
7.6H - 54% overall mastery
solve problems using qualitative and quantitative predictions and comparisons from simple experiments
#6 - 11% full credit; 51% partial credit; 37% no credit
#29 - 71% correct
Analysis
Instructional Implications
Remind students that questions about predictions and experiments are more about reading than calculation
Show them how the most obvious wrong answer was available (i.e., biography) to trip them up
Comments