top of page
Writer's pictureAaron Daffern

Lessons learned from the 2024 4th Grade Math STAAR

The 2024 4th Grade Math STAAR continued statewide online testing and several new item types. Using a modified version of the statewide item analysis report, I examined the readiness standards that had less than 60% mastery. Each standard has both an analysis of the items themselves to infer what made them so difficult and instructional implications for educators to ensure a more successful 2025 STAAR test.

 

Standard

# of items

% mastery

4.5D

2

32

4.4H

1

35

4.3E

1

39

4.8C

2

40.5

4.7C

1

46

4.3D

2

48

4.5A

2

50

4.5B

2

52

4.4A

1

55

4.2G

2

58

4.6D

1

59

 
 

Access the slide deck here.


4.5D - 32% overall mastery

solve problems related to perimeter and area of rectangles where dimensions are whole numbers


#9 - 42% correct


#24 - 22% correct

Analysis
  • Students had to derive dimensions of a square given the perimeter to calculate the area (#9)

  • Students had to find the area of a composite shape (3.6D)

  • For #24, most student (36%) chose C [perimeter]

Instructional Implications
  • Show students how to draw a representation to visualize the problem

  • Practice composite figures, finding area multiple ways and perimeter

 

4.4H - 35% overall mastery

solve with fluency one- and two-step problems involving multiplication and division, including interpreting remainders


#4 - 35% correct

Analysis
  • Students had to divide twice

  • Almost as many students chose A (29%), dividing once, as those who chose the correct answer

Instructional Implications
  • Have students draw strip diagrams to represent the relationships

  • Model for students how to use multiple strip diagrams (or a multi-part strip diagram) to solve two-step problems

 

Watch the full walkthrough of all 32 items on the 2024 4th Grade STAAR below.

 

4.3E - 39% overall mastery

represent and solve addition and subtraction of fractions with equal denominators using objects and pictorial models that build to the number line and properties of operations


#14 - 39% correct

Analysis
  • Both measurement problems involved money

  • First problem (#3) was fairly straightforward

  • Second problem (#16) was more challenging, requiring counting bills and coins, calculating change, and entering exact amount

Instructional Implications
  • Give students problems to solve involving money, including calculating change, and remove all answer choices

  • Ask variety of questions from collection of coins (e.g., How much more money until she saves $--? If she adds 3 more dimes and 4 more quarters…?)

 

4.8C - 40.5% overall mastery

solve problems that deal with measurements of length, intervals of time, liquid volumes, mass, and money using addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division as appropriate


#3 - 61% correct


#16 - 20% correct


Analysis
  • Student had to interpret a picture to name fractions and name them

  • The fraction button on the equation editor is not intuitive

Instructional Implications
  • Give students opportunities on Cambium to enter fractions

  • Show how the picture gives the answer without needing to add fractions

 

4.7C - 46% overall mastery

determine the approximate measures of angles in degrees to the nearest whole number using a protractor


#13 - 46% correct

Analysis
  • Correct answer required students to subtract measures

  • Almost as many students chose C (38%) as D

Instructional Implications
  • Use actual protractors during instruction and have students draw an angle and calculate it multiple times with different starting values

  • Use reasonableness and right angles to eliminate answer selections

 

4.3D - 48% overall mastery

compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators and represent the comparison using the symbols >, =, or <


#8 - 59% correct


#22 - 37% correct

Analysis
  • Students did fairly well with simple comparison (#8)

  • For #22, more students chose B (40%) than correct answer (A)

  • For #22, students had to compare three different denominators, all improper

Instructional Implications
  • Practice comparing fractions with three or four different denominators

  • Give students opportunities to use reasoning to quickly compare fractions

 

4.5A - 50% overall mastery

represent multi-step problems involving the four operations with whole numbers using strip diagrams and equations with a letter standing for the unknown quantity


#7 - 44% correct


#23 - 37% full credit; 37% partial credit; 26% no credit

Analysis
  • For #7, students used a strip diagram to represent subtraction and division

  • Students had to correctly interpret “split evenly” with divide by 2

Instructional Implications
  • Have students draw strip diagrams to represent problems that ask for equations

  • Teach students to solve each problem, in addition to representing it, to check their answers

 

4.5B - 52% overall mastery

represent problems using an input-output table and numerical expressions to generate a number pattern that follows a given rule representing the relationship of the values in the resulting sequence and their position in the sequence


#10 - 47% correct


#32 - 57% correct


Analysis
  • Both problems involved additive relationships

  • For #32, 30% of students chose A (+7 to output, not input)

Instructional Implications
  • Ensure students know that the rule is applied from input to output, regardless of orientation of the table

  • Give students practice with adding a third column that represents the expression that applies the rule

 

4.4A - 55% overall mastery

add and subtract whole numbers and decimals to the hundredths place using the standard algorithm


#19 - 55% correct

Analysis
  • Basic decimal addition and subtraction with regrouping

  • Students had to interpret “save” and “coupon” as subtraction

Instructional Implications
  • Students should still draw a strip diagram or picture to represent the problem

  • Provide multiple terms for real-life situations that denote addition or subtraction

 

4.2g - 58% overall mastery

relate decimals to fractions that name tenths and hundredths


#5 - 64% correct


#29 - 52% correct

Analysis
  • Both problems involved improper fractions

Instructional Implications
  • Show students multiple visualizations of improper fractions and correct naming of decimals

  • Connect regrouping 10 ones into 1 ten with regrouping 10 tenths into 1 one

 

4.6D - 59% overall mastery

classify two-dimensional figures based on the presence or absence of parallel or perpendicular lines or the presence or absence of angles of a specified size


#28 - 39% full credit; 40% partial credit; 21% no credit

Analysis
  • Students most likely easily identified Figure R and struggled with Figure T

  • Figure T is a heptagon/septagon (7-sided)

Instructional Implications
  • Provide practice opportunities for identifying perpendicular and parallel lines with irregular shapes

88 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page